Cats and the Comm Lab

If my Comm meeting starts at 11am, do I enter the meeting at 10:59, 11:00, or 11:01? The new question during zoom times. Does MIT time still exist during the zoom era? (asking for a friend…) Luckily my mom started talking to me, so the question was answered for me, 11:02. Zoom meeting with people I don't know, especially when the meeting is about them judging your work, usually causes a lot of anxiety. Yet the second I entered the meeting; I felt my worries float away. It may have been that he seemed like he had such a kind personality, it also didn't hurt that his cat was playing in the background.  Another awkward moment, taking notes. The camera shows you looking down so you could be doing anything. Are you on your phone, sewing, doing anything but paying attention, or are you writing notes? I usually just state that I'm writing notes so that there is no confusion. I've heard of too many friends get scolded for “looking on their phone” when they were just taking notes.

After a quick introduction, we started talking about how to create a methods section. We talked about how the methods section is a Goldilocks situation, not too detailed but not too vague. He chuckled at my confused face knowing my next question would be "How do I know what's too detailed and what's too vague?" He said practice makes perfect and read a lot of method's sections and you get the hang of it. We talked about boiling down our words, to look for words that don’t add anything. He mentioned that the comm lad had a FAQ page on the methods section, a page I heavily used when editing my methods section later. I would tell you everything we spoke about, but you should go to the Comm lab and find out for yourself! I can promise it will be one of the best things you do!

-          Giramnah


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Abstracting an Abstract

Grappling with scientific writing was quite the challenge. I typically love to embellish my essays and revel in every little detail, so working to cut that out was different, to be sure. Nevertheless, eventually I felt comfortable enough to write the summary in a way I felt good about. I figured, after having worked through the rest of the data summary, the abstract would follow logically. After all, I’d delved into excruciating depth for each portion, so I definitely knew enough to write the abstract, right? Well, therein lies the issue. My first go at the abstract was horribly detailed, truly an essay in itself. Clearly, that wouldn’t do. I tried again, attempting to strip the abstract down to its bare essentials. After having worked on one project for so long though, my definition of ‘bare essentials’ was a tad skewed. Needless to say, it was still longer than ideal. I then resolved to just look to other papers for inspiration, after all, they’d had plenty of experience writing abst
Read more

The Art of Science - Module 1

Creative writing and/or writing for fun is certainly different than science writing! I think I'm used to essays flowing smooth as silk, waves on sand, gel pens on paper, brushes on canvas, but this assignment seemed to try and combine many rigid elements into a greater idea. Like ligating the sticky ends of DNA fragments... or something like that.  The process of revising, editing, and iterating is all the same! The hardest part for this assignment was in the end trying to craft a message that really expressed why the reader should care! Not what the focus of our project is, but more, now that everything is said is done, and we have results, data-driven conclusions and figures, why should anyone care? What did we accomplish? Any breakthroughs? Did we push the envelope of knowledge in our field, and does it have any relevance to readers outside of that field? I guess I spent most of my thought and work into figuring out how to frame the broader implications of our research.   I felt
Read more

When do you stop rewriting?

The hardest part of scientific communication for me is figuring out exactly how I want to word things. For more structured outlines, I'm wholly dependent on outlines as scaffolds for my ideas. I always have ten thousand considerations racing in my mind, constantly ruminating on which phrases to include and what the perfect word for a concept is. It's less sentences and more fragments, which is amazing for outlines. I can build off of these blocks and find the right bit of logic to use in each place. But when I construct a sentence, when I polish that meaning, I find myself second-guessing each word and trying to make the structure more fluid. The tricky thing about scientific communication is that there's always a more concise, more purposeful way to elucidate your rationale. The data summary is about learning how to write in this way, but I don't know the jargon. I can reiterate the lectures and understand the purpose of our experiments, but when positioned as the auth
Read more