Elegant, but effective scientific communication

 The hardest part of scientific writing for me is balancing concise phrasing with descriptive explanations. This module helped me realize how defining a research problem well can make it much easier to separate meaningful facts and analyses from less significant ones. 


During the module, I learned how to create a logical flow toward a hypothesis and experimental design from background information. I was able to consider the numerous factors involved in DNA damage while ultimately forming a cohesive narrative that can be shared with other scientists. Initially, it was challenging to select the most meaningful background research to explain the purpose of our experiments. It was also difficult to select the most meaninful data analyses and conclusions, but referring back to the gaps identified in our background and motivations section was crucial. Although each research project differs in its content, I have recognized the value of identifying existing research gaps that motivate an experiment, as this defines the remaining components of an effective report or presentation. As I move on to other modules of this class, I plan on using this structural guide. 


In essence, as a fan of creative writing, I have to remind myself before beginning scientific writing that my primary goal is to use clear and direct language. While science certainly has its elegance and beauty, its written communication has a particular structure. During Module 1, I was able to develop my skills in this genre. I learned how to effectively summarize experimental procedures and processes such as the BER pathway. This translated well into the Data Summary, which has been a great learning experience! 


-Imane Bouzit 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When do you stop rewriting?

The hardest part of scientific communication for me is figuring out exactly how I want to word things. For more structured outlines, I'm wholly dependent on outlines as scaffolds for my ideas. I always have ten thousand considerations racing in my mind, constantly ruminating on which phrases to include and what the perfect word for a concept is. It's less sentences and more fragments, which is amazing for outlines. I can build off of these blocks and find the right bit of logic to use in each place. But when I construct a sentence, when I polish that meaning, I find myself second-guessing each word and trying to make the structure more fluid. The tricky thing about scientific communication is that there's always a more concise, more purposeful way to elucidate your rationale. The data summary is about learning how to write in this way, but I don't know the jargon. I can reiterate the lectures and understand the purpose of our experiments, but when positioned as the auth
Read more

Abstracting an Abstract

Grappling with scientific writing was quite the challenge. I typically love to embellish my essays and revel in every little detail, so working to cut that out was different, to be sure. Nevertheless, eventually I felt comfortable enough to write the summary in a way I felt good about. I figured, after having worked through the rest of the data summary, the abstract would follow logically. After all, I’d delved into excruciating depth for each portion, so I definitely knew enough to write the abstract, right? Well, therein lies the issue. My first go at the abstract was horribly detailed, truly an essay in itself. Clearly, that wouldn’t do. I tried again, attempting to strip the abstract down to its bare essentials. After having worked on one project for so long though, my definition of ‘bare essentials’ was a tad skewed. Needless to say, it was still longer than ideal. I then resolved to just look to other papers for inspiration, after all, they’d had plenty of experience writing abst
Read more

The Art of Science - Module 1

Creative writing and/or writing for fun is certainly different than science writing! I think I'm used to essays flowing smooth as silk, waves on sand, gel pens on paper, brushes on canvas, but this assignment seemed to try and combine many rigid elements into a greater idea. Like ligating the sticky ends of DNA fragments... or something like that.  The process of revising, editing, and iterating is all the same! The hardest part for this assignment was in the end trying to craft a message that really expressed why the reader should care! Not what the focus of our project is, but more, now that everything is said is done, and we have results, data-driven conclusions and figures, why should anyone care? What did we accomplish? Any breakthroughs? Did we push the envelope of knowledge in our field, and does it have any relevance to readers outside of that field? I guess I spent most of my thought and work into figuring out how to frame the broader implications of our research.   I felt
Read more